July 10, 2025

Hot Take: Your Attribution Efforts Are a Waste of Time, Money, and Sanity

Brett Van Buskirk

Brett Van Buskirk, VP of Marketing at Data People, shares his perspective on Attribution. With 15+ years leading marketing at high-growth companies—from being the first product marketing hire at Blend, to expanding TAM by $1B at Taxbit through repositioning—Brett has wrestled with attribution models across every stage of company growth. He's had a front-row seat to what marketing measurement approaches actually drive results versus those that become costly distractions.

🌶️ Hot Take: Your Attribution Efforts Are a Waste of Time, Money, and Sanity

My Thinking: The pursuit of perfect attribution is a fool's errand. Is it first touch, last touch, or most time spent? How should we weigh digital vs. in-person interactions? Who cares, here's why:

  1. It's Inherently Flawed and Misleading:
    • The Impossible Journey: Customers rarely follow a linear path. They interact with countless touchpoints – often unmeasurable ones (word-of-mouth, offline events, subconscious brand impressions) – before converting. Attribution models attempt to assign credit to discrete, trackable events, ignoring the vast, messy reality of the buyer's journey.
    • Last-Touch Fallacy (and others): While simple, last-touch attribution gives all credit to the final interaction, ignoring everything before. Multi-touch models are more sophisticated but still rely on assumptions about the value of each touchpoint, which are often arbitrary and rarely reflect true impact.
    • The Human Element: Marketing influences human behavior. People don't convert because of a single ad; they convert because of a cumulative understanding, trust, and perceived value built over time. Attribution models struggle to quantify this.
  2. It's Wasteful and Divisive:
    • Resource Drain: Building, maintaining, and defending complex attribution models consumes significant time, budget, and analytical talent that could be better spent on actual growth initiatives.
    • Internal Conflict: When every team's bonus or budget depends on "proving" their attribution, it fosters a combative environment. Marketing channels become silos, fighting over credit rather than collaborating to serve customer and company goals. Sales blames marketing for poor leads, marketing blames sales for not closing, and "attribution" becomes the weapon of choice to deflect blame for poor performance.
    • Short-Termism: The need to demonstrate immediate attributable ROI often pushes teams towards short-term, easily trackable tactics at the expense of crucial long-term brand building, content strategy, or experimental initiatives that are harder to tie directly to revenue.
  3. Even Perfect Attribution Has Limited Utility:
    • So What?: Let's imagine, for a moment, you could perfectly attribute every dollar of revenue to every specific marketing or sales touchpoint. What would you do differently? Would you suddenly stop investing in brand awareness because its ROI is harder to pinpoint? Would you completely eliminate channels that contribute indirectly but are vital to the overall customer experience?
    • Optimization, Not Elimination: The goal should be optimization and impact, not just assigning credit. Understanding influence and lift across the entire customer journey is far more valuable than precise, but often meaningless, attribution assessments.
    • Focus on Outcomes, Not Inputs: Instead of trying to slice the pie differently based on attribution, focus on the overall growth of the pie: customer acquisition cost (CAC), customer lifetime value (LTV), brand strength, and market share. These are the true indicators of marketing effectiveness.

The Practical Takeaway: Focus on Contribution, Not Just Attribution

Instead of chasing the attribution dragon, redirect your energy and resources towards understanding and optimizing the contributory impact of your marketing and sales efforts across the entire customer journey:

  • Define Clear Business Outcomes First: What are your ultimate goals? (e.g., pipeline growth, customer retention, market penetration). Ensure these are shared across the entire GTM team and work backward from these, not from individual channel metrics.
  • Embrace Holistic Measurement: Look at a basket of metrics that tell a complete story:
    • Overall ROI: What's the aggregate return on your GTM spend?
    • Cohort Analysis: How do different customer cohorts behave over time, regardless of their initial touchpoint?
    • Channel/Experience Influence: What influence may a channel or experience have? When it most commonly positive or present?
    • Brand Health Metrics: Track awareness, perception, and sentiment if possible.
    • Surveys & Qualitative Feedback: Ask customers how they discovered you and what influenced their decision. This provides invaluable "untrackable" insights.
  • Foster Cross-Functional Collaboration: Break down silos. Marketing, sales, and product teams should work together on shared revenue goals. They should develop a comprehensive understanding of how each contributes in different, yet equally vital ways.
  • Invest in Experimentation & Learning: Dedicate budget to testing new channels and strategies, even if their direct attribution is murky. Focus on learning what drives overall growth and customer satisfaction. Do not strive for a specific ROI and payback period for these tests. Align leadership expectations appropriately.

The pursuit of attribution makes academic sense. However, in the pursuit of arriving at a handful of discrete drivers of GTM success, our distillation loses nuances and insight. It pits teams and tactics against each other, creating a disjointed GTM motion that is more interested in personal victory than shared success. A shift from attribution demands a shift in mindset but leads to more effective, collaborative, and ultimately, more impactful marketing. A larger, messier piece, is always better than a perfectly attributed smaller pie.